Dates | King Name | Years |
---|---|---|
625-605 BCE | Nabopolassar | 21 years |
604-562 BCE | Nebuchadnezzar | 43 years |
561-560 BCE | Awel-Marduk | 2 years |
559-556 BCE | Neriglissar | 4 years |
556 BCE | Labashi-Marduk | < 1 year |
555-539 BCE | Nabonidus | 17 years |
These king lists may have shared a common source. Since we know Nabonidus' reign ended in 539 BCE (see above) we can begin assigning dates to each reign working backwards from 539 BCE. When we get to Nebuchadnezzar we realize his 18th year, which is the year of Jerusalem's destruction, (2 Kings 25:8, Insight vol. 2 pg. 481) would be 587 BCE.
The chronology of the 26th dynasty of Egypt, known as the Saite period, has been independently established from the Neo-Babylonian. The names and lengths of reign of the first four pharaohs of this dynasty are known to us by inscriptions of ancient grave stele. The last two are known to us by the writings of the historians Herodotus and Manetho. They're confirmed by the papyrus Rylands IX (Petition of Petiese) and the Demotic Chronicle. Psammetichus III's reign was brief, terminated by the conquest of Egypt by Persian king Cambyses II. It's agreed by scholars and the WTS that this happened in 525 BCE. (See Insight vol. 1 pg. 698-699) By working backwards, as we did for the Babylonian kings, we can date the reign of each pharaoh of this dynasty. | Pharaoh Name | Years | Dates |
---|---|---|---|
Psammetichus I | 54 years | 664-610 BCE | |
Necho II | 15 years | 610-595 BCE | |
Psammetichus II | 6 years | 595-589 BCE | |
Apries (Hophra) | 19 years | 589-570 BCE | |
Amasis | 44 years | 570-526 BCE | |
Psammetichus III | < 1 year | 526-525 BCE | |
Consider some WTS dates that conflict with the Egyptian
chronology because of the inserted 20 year period in history to make
Jerusalem destroyed in 607 BCE instead of 587 BCE:
|
The Neo-Babylonian era, coinciding with Babylon's role as an empire, began with Nabopolassar in 625 BC. (see chart above) An attempt to insert 20 years into that era, as is required to date Jerusalem's destruction to 607 BCE instead of 587 BCE, would push it back 20 years into conflict with the dates for the kings of the previous era (see chart right). Evidence for the dates of the reigns of two kings before Nabopolassar will only strengthen the argument against that attempt to move the "neo" era back and against 607 BCE: | King Name | Years | Dates |
---|---|---|---|
Shamashshumukin | 20 years | 668-648 BCE | |
Kandalanu | 22 years | 647-626 BCE | |
Start of the Neo-Babylonian era with king Nabopolassar in 625 BCE. (see chart above) | |||
|